Brigitte Gabriel @ Calvary Chapel Lake Stevens part 1
Written by Ed on August 16, 2010 – 11:00 pm -Brigitte Gabriel talks about the threat of radical Islamic terrorism in america.
Posted in Serious Side | 6 Comments »
6 Responses
to “Brigitte Gabriel @ Calvary Chapel Lake Stevens part 1”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
By zoomie72 on Aug 16, 2010 11:54 pm | Reply
“America needs to see the barbarism that is coming [its] way”; “my past is your future”
from a woman who has “been there, seen that”
By catzilla02p2 on Aug 17, 2010 5:44 am | Reply
ooh I am wondering if she is also a birther. I have heard her speak. it does make me wonder wat is her game. could it be ? let me make you after of anyone that is not one of us? Bush did do one thing right he said muslims are not the enemy al qaeda is. that is the only thing that he has ever done that made me proud of our president.
By zoomie72 on Aug 17, 2010 9:12 pm | Reply
What is her point?? Her point was that Lebanon is a clear case of what can happen to an educated, Christian majority nation that does not maintain its diligence, believing that “it can’t happen here”.
Why must you immediately go to name-calling and ad hominem attacks? Is it because you have no other argument or point with substance?
“The Muslims” are not the enemy, and neither are “the conservatives” or “the birthers” or any other convenient bin for those we dislike or disapprove of. The enemy is, in fact, anyone who wants, and attempts, to take away our American heritage and the country and system that we have worked, as a nation, for over 230 years to build. We have a right – we have an obligation – to protect and preserve the belssings of liberty unto ourselves and our posterity…
I have read so many postings lamenting the debt that we are leaving our grndchildren, and I have great fear that the ceomonic burden we are pushing off into the future may be a very difficult challenge to overcome, and Ihope that we can undo it. However, the national debt and the terrible place that Messianic spending is leading us will matter not one whit should we lose our nation, and its laws and its foundations, to the tide of Islamization. If freedom of religion is to be preserved “Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion, no prohibit the free exercise thereof”, then under what basis should we enforce Shari’a law? Is that not making a law of religion? Are we to have two sets of laws: one for believers and one for infidels? Or shall I play ostrich and stick my head in the sand and let Lebanon happen here… and it will. If we let it.
By catzilla02p2 on Aug 19, 2010 4:48 am | Reply
I remember hearing that in the 20′s or 30′s or sometime around there Lebanon was the las vegas of the middle east. now that was before the zealots stormed in and started shooting the place up cause they wanted to be in charge and didnt like the ways or actions of other zealots and have turned the country into a war zone. I do have the belief that if any zealots are put in power here it could happen. people are under the mistaken thought this country is a christian country. the country has several different christian groups that would not get along. this is and should be a secular thinking country. you want to be religious, good for you, don’t force your way of life on me. maybe she thinks this country should be the christian version of the Taliban. this country is founded on freedom and choices. Take that away and you have removed the thing that is America. Shari’a law and the 10 commandments none of our laws are based on either of these things. Nor should they be.
By zoomie72 on Aug 19, 2010 10:24 am | Reply
exactly the point, that in over 230 years, the Christian majority [and yes there has been one, if not one now] has NOT instituted a religious order/oligarchy in this country, BUT – given the opportunity, as it has demonstrtaed in EVERY single country in which it has achieved a majority, Islam HAS
“Take that away and you have removed the thing that is America” and that is in my opinion, the entire intent of Muslim leadership, to take away the freedom to choose
By catzilla02p2 on Aug 19, 2010 1:28 pm | Reply
the point that you are missing is that all religions want to take a away freedom to choose. as far as the Christian majority not instituting a religious order/theocracy it is not like they haven’t tried ,in the 230 yrs our country has been around, they (a Christian majority of one type or another)have been trying to turn this country into a religious order/theocracy have they been successful NO.do they still try yep. cause one day they will be in power and they will be able to make the rules.