<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ever wonder why they keep cutting down Sarah Palin ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ourlighterside.com/2009/11/29/ever-wonder-why-they-keep-cutting-down-sarah-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ourlighterside.com/2009/11/29/ever-wonder-why-they-keep-cutting-down-sarah-palin/</link>
	<description>Jokes, fun sfuff, serious stuff and photos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bogus</title>
		<link>http://ourlighterside.com/2009/11/29/ever-wonder-why-they-keep-cutting-down-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ourlighterside.com/?p=4832#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>I personally don&#039;t trust Sarah Palin, as I found long ago that those who spend more time talking about their idealogical credentials than administrative tend to turn out to be rather useless.  That said, the article makes a valid point.  Democrats and the Fourth Estate have spent a lot of time and energy depicting the GOP as exclusively comprised of stodgy old white guys who hate everybody.  One might even say they&#039;ve bet the farm on it, since it seems the standard leftist response to any challenge has become cry racism/sexism/etc. and hope the audience is sufficiently distracted.  Palin&#039;s mere presence flies in the face of that so carefuly engineered narrative, which is probably why they&#039;re opting for the damnatio memoriae route.

To be fair though, Republicans aren&#039;t exactly very effective at pushing back.  Case in point, their 2008 presidential candidates pretty much typified the Republican party as portrayed by the Democratic party.  Palin, as a sort of &quot;counter-Obama&quot; is a good start but it simply isn&#039;t going to go anywhere if leadership continues to run RINOs and hope voters won&#039;t see through them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally don&#8217;t trust Sarah Palin, as I found long ago that those who spend more time talking about their idealogical credentials than administrative tend to turn out to be rather useless.  That said, the article makes a valid point.  Democrats and the Fourth Estate have spent a lot of time and energy depicting the GOP as exclusively comprised of stodgy old white guys who hate everybody.  One might even say they&#8217;ve bet the farm on it, since it seems the standard leftist response to any challenge has become cry racism/sexism/etc. and hope the audience is sufficiently distracted.  Palin&#8217;s mere presence flies in the face of that so carefuly engineered narrative, which is probably why they&#8217;re opting for the damnatio memoriae route.</p>
<p>To be fair though, Republicans aren&#8217;t exactly very effective at pushing back.  Case in point, their 2008 presidential candidates pretty much typified the Republican party as portrayed by the Democratic party.  Palin, as a sort of &#8220;counter-Obama&#8221; is a good start but it simply isn&#8217;t going to go anywhere if leadership continues to run RINOs and hope voters won&#8217;t see through them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
