6/100th of an inch cost 3M a lot of $$$

Written by chuck on March 28, 2008 – 4:26 pm -

Click for details

Seems like a very high and unfair settlement, but why would 3M not put the correct size on their tape.


Posted in Serious Side | 4 Comments »



4 Responses to “6/100th of an inch cost 3M a lot of $$$”

  1. By Nola on Mar 28, 2008 4:56 pm | Reply

    I am so upset I will probably never sleep again. All those 100ft. rolls of vinyl my husband used to buy from 3M. They may have only been 99ft 11 & 9/12 of an inch long. They should be punished to the end of time for their horrible treatment of the public. Seriously, I have never heard of such foolishness, shows the county government needed more work to do so they wouldn’t be spending their time on such garbage.

  2. By JeeperMike on Mar 31, 2008 8:54 am | Reply

    Let’s hope these crazies don’t go to the Home Depot and start measuring 2×4′s

  3. By Bogus on Mar 31, 2008 6:41 pm | Reply

    Why am I not surprised this happened in California?

  4. By Ed on Mar 31, 2008 9:05 pm | Reply

    Now how do you expect the lawyers in California to make payments on their new sports cars?

You must be logged in to post a comment.